Something big is going on at Giza, and the internet is on fire with speculation about it. The internet is abuzz with the news about new findings in the Great Pyramid on Egypt's Giza Plateau. It has been reported that strange markings have been found inside what many of the news reports have been calling a "secret tunnel". True to form, the news media is either hyperbolizing, or they just plain got the facts wrong. The tunnel is has not been a secret for a number of years. The secret has been what is in the tunnel, and where it leads. There is, however, a mystery involved here. The mystery involves some strange hieroglyphic-type markings found inside the tunnel. They are done in red paint, and are found on the floor of the tunnel and on the walls. Not accessible to the human frame as yet, the tunnel was explored by a robot rover with a camera mounted on it. Using the remote controlled robot, the archeologists were able to determine the tunnel runs for runs for some distance and ends at what appears to be another door. It is one of four known secret tunnels that lead from the "King's Chamber" and the "Queen's Chamber". The purpose of the tunnels is not known. The first big story in this event is that the hieroglyphic-type markings are yet to be understood. It does seem quite odd that these markings were found in a pyramid that the Egyptologists claim was built by Pharaoh Khufu (an Egyptian), and they can read the hieroglyphs found from his time. Yet, they cannot yet decode these hieroglyphs from inside the very pyramid they say he built. These are symbols that do not apparently fit with the system of writing known to Egyptologists as hieroglyphics. This would seem to raise the possibility that while these markings are a language, they are not Egyptian. Since the tomb of Osiris was found in a "secret" underground tomb just a few yards from the Great Pyramid (the spot marked by the star Deneb in the Cygnus constellation), is it possible the Great Pyramid was built by the Osiris clan and not by Khufu? If so, is it possible the myths about Osiris and his family (Ra, Isis, Thoth, Set) not being from this planet are true? Perhaps those hieroglyphic-type markings are in the language of Osiris. The second great mystery in this event is that it comes on the heels of finding the tomb of Osiris in 2010, and the discovery by NASA satellites of a massive collection of buried pyramids on the Giza Plateau. When the tomb of Osiris was found, several very odd measures were undertaken almost immediately. Dr. Zahi Hawass (Minister of Antiquities) ordered that a wall be constructed around the pyramid complex. This was, ostensibly, to protect the pyramids from being damaged by the public. It has been reported on various internet sites that the U.S.military was there securing the pyramid complex along with Egyptian military. And then, there is the question of the NASA satellite imaging of the Giza Plateau. Why? It has been done before. We already had pictures from space of the Pyramids. Why now? Why a NASA satellite? When you line up the discoveries and events, a very interesting picture begins to emerge. tomb of Osiris found sarcophagus of Osiris opened but no concurrent photos of what is inside Dr. Hawass says the sarcophagus was empty military called in to secure the site Order is given to build a wall around the pyramid complex NASA satellite called upon to do high-tech scan of the site 17 additional pyramids located in satellite scan hieroglyphic-type markings found in pyramid that hieroglyph experts can't read yet Certainly, this line-up of events gives the appearance that something big--very big--has been discovered at the Giza Plateau. Not only is it something big, it is something of military importance. Not only is it of military importance, it is very secret. The line-up of events listed above is not theoretical, nor speculative. Those are genuine events. Yet, the internet is filled with speculation about what has been discovered. One theory being touted is that they have found a stargate. Maybe. Maybe not. Critics of the UFO community tend to ridicule all the speculation. But, when all the facts are not on the table then all speculation is valid. In fact, it is inevitable. Oh, by the way, the name of the robot that took the photo above is Djedi, and the team working with it is the Djedi Team. Djedi is the name of an ancient Egyptian magician in the days of Khufu. The "d" and the "j" are pronounced together making the pronunciation of the word to be JEDI. You remember the JEDI Knights of Star Wars fame, right? One thing seems to be certain. Something very big is going on at Giza.

Dr. S. James Gates, Jr., a theoretical physicist, the John S. Toll Professor of Physics at the University of Maryland, and the Director of The Center for String & Particle Theory, is reporting that certain string theory, super-symmetrical equations, which describe the fundamental nature of the Universe and reality, contain embedded computer codes. These codes are digital data in the form of 1′s and 0′s. Not only that, these codes are the same as what make web browsers work and are error-correction codes! Gates says, “We have no idea what these ‘things’ are doing there”. http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0051Gates is baffled by what the binary code is doing there as are his colleagues. The discovery has whipped many conspiracy theorists, new age types and others with fringe views into a frenzy all over the internet, not to mention the religious groups, some of whom are interpreting the discovery as evidence that at the very least there must be some kind of intelligence or designer behind the laws of physics.God is a hacker.
if (empty($universe)) { include 'reality.php'; }

I Believe in UFOs  documentary from the BBC features actor Danny Dyer as he investigates topics that include UFOs, aliens from beyond Earth, crop circles, and other paranormal phenomena. Dyer holds discussions with several expert researchers, authorities on UFOs, and individuals who report having mysterious and unexplained encounters that may have had extraterrestrial origins. The film I Believe in UFOs attempts to provide an even-handed presentation, interviewing people on all sides of the paranormal issue and balancing the ideas of those who believe in such occurrences with those who remain skeptical of them. Included in the film is fascinating footage of crop circles from 2009 and a display of discomfort by Danny Dyer during a spiritual session at ECETI with James Gilliland, a UFO enthusiast who has published testimonials from among the thousands of people who have visited his ranch and been witnesses to UFO sightings. Dyer talks with one man who has claimed to have evidence indicating that he was abducted by extraterrestrials. Dyer also investigates the reported discoveries of UFO landing sites, as well as alleged proof that beings from beyond Earth have performed scientific experiments in Britain. One of the high points in the film is Dyer’s meeting with his childhood hero, Sir Patrick Moore, amateur astronomer and former president of the British Astronomical Association. Moore gained fame through the authorship of some 70 books and as a long-time presenter on The Sky at Night, a BBC television series. Moore has been credited with enhancing astronomy’s profile among the general public in the United Kingdom. Dyer’s quest for information about UFOs and his attempt to have a sighting of his own ultimately takes him to the UFO Research Center in Portland, Oregon.  

The Shroud of Turin is a centuries old linen cloth that bears the image of a crucified man. A man that millions believe to be Jesus of Nazareth. Is it really the cloth that wrapped his crucified body, or is it simply a medieval forgery, a hoax perpetrated by some clever artist? Modern science has completed hundreds of thousands of hours of detailed study and intense research on the Shroud. It is, in fact, the single most studied artifact in human history, and we know more about it today than we ever have before. And yet, the controversy still rages. Click for Larger ViewThe image on the Shroud of Turin is very subtle. The closer you get, the less distinct it becomes. One of the best ways to look at the Shroud image is on a photographic negative. There, the light and dark values are reversed and the image appears more realistic and natural.The Shroud is a linen cloth woven in a 3-over-1 herringbone pattern, and measures 14'3" x 3'7".  These dimensions correlate with ancient measurements of 2 cubits x 8 cubits - consistent with loom technology of the period.  The finer weave of 3-over-1 herringbone is consistent with the New Testament statement that the "sindon" (or shroud) was purchased by Joseph of Arimathea, who was a wealthy man.  Also, Leviticus 19:19 speaks of the mixing of linen and cotton, but prohibits linen and wool or the mixing of vegetable and animal.  In 1969, Dr. Gilbert Raes of the Ghent Institute of Textile Technology in Belgium noted that there are traces of cotton (identified as Gossipium herbaceum) in the linen of the Shroud.In June 2002, the Shroud was sent to a team of experts for restoration.  One of them was Swiss textile historian Mechthild Flury-Lemberg.  She was surprised to find a peculiar stitching pattern in the seam of one long side of the Shroud, where a three-inch wide strip of the same original fabric was sewn onto a larger segment. The stitching pattern, which she says was the work of a professional, is quite similar to the hem of a cloth found in the tombs of the Jewish fortress of Masada.  The Masada cloth dates to between 40 BC and 73 AD.  This kind of stitch has never been found in Medieval Europe.Several studies have challenged the validity of the 1988 Carbon-14 tests done at Oxford, Zurich and Arizona Labs, which stated the shroud was made in the medieval ages.The shroud was badly damaged in a church fire in 1532 AD.  Nuns patched burn holes and stitched the shroud to a reinforcing cloth that is now known as the Holland cloth."  This probably occurred in 1534.No one knows for sure how the images were created.  The images are scorch-like, yet not created by heat, and are a purely surface phenomenon limited to the crowns of the top fibers.  The Shroud is clearly not a painting; no evidence of pigments or media was found.  The blood was on the Cloth before the image (an unlikely way for an artist to work).  There is no outline, no binders to hold paint, no evidence that paint, dye, ink, or chalk created the images, and there are no brush strokes.  According to world-renowned artist Isabel Piczek, the images have no style that would fit into any period of art history.  The images show perfect photo-negativity and 3-dimensionality.  It is not a Vaporgraph or natural result of vapors. The blood on the Shroud is real, human male blood of the type AB (typed by Dr. Baima Ballone in Turin and confirmed in the U.S.).  This blood type is rare (about 3% of the world population), with the frequency varying from one region to another.  Blood chemist Dr. Alan Adler (University of Western Connecticut) and the late Dr. John Heller (New England Institute of Medicine) found a high concentration of the pigment bilirubin, consistent with someone dying under great stress or trauma and making the color more red than normal ancient blood.  Drs. Victor and Nancy Tryon of the University of Texas Health Science Center found X & Y chromosomes representing male blood and "degraded DNA" (approximately 700 base pairs) "consistent with the supposition of ancient blood."

An 11 year old boy was scared out of his mind after seeing a UFO.The incident occurred when the boy and his Uncle thought they would have a good time stepping outside and enjoy watching some shooting stars together.When all of the sudden a UFO comes out of nowhere.Several pictures were taken of the UFO, the UFO was described as taking a sharp northeast turn ,then hovering.The father wanted to help  his terrified son calm down ,so he told his son to send the pictures thinking it was nothing and that he would be able to put the boys mind at ease.When the father saw the pictures he said ,this is not a shooting star ,they would never have been able to capture so many pictures if that was the case.   According to [examiner.com  An 11-year-old Texas boy was "terrified" after watching and photographing a strange object about 10:15 p.m. on December 13, 2012, moving and hovering over Haslet, according to the father's testimony from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database. Haslet is a town in Denton and Tarrant counties, population 1,517 in northeastern Texas. We previously reported on two UFO cases on the same date in Texas in: Texas witnesses report multiple objects moving at high speed. The child and his uncle were outside watching shooting stars when the object was first seen. "All if the sudden this object appeared out of nowhere with no tail, like a shooting star should have, and was quite brighter than anything they had seen," the father stated. "It went in a sharp northeast direction, stopped and hovered." At this point, the boy began taking photos of the object with his iPhone. Submitted with the MUFON report on December 14, 2012, were: Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 4, and Image 5.